Dan Leger (The Chronicle Herald) - Are the Mounties finally changing their ways? Has the storied but sullied force actually learned its lessons, painful as they’ve been? Let’s hope so. Canadians have the right to expect change for the better in their federal police.
The past few years’ headlines must have been brutal for thousands of serving and retired officers, men and women who served their country well. They’ve had to watch as reports about corruption, abuse of power, brutality and violations of civil liberties dragged their good name through the mud.
But it’s more than a public-relations fiasco. Bad management and incompetent leadership have literally killed members. Officers have been lost at least partly because of poor training and supervision.
The rot runs deep. Last year, commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli retired in disgrace over the force’s problems and his inability to tell the truth to Parliament, mostly about the Maher Arar affair. His departure marked the low point in the force’s recent history.
But there have been many other problems, people who died in RCMP custody, fraud in the force’s pension plan, allegations of discrimination and incompetence.
There are signs that the Mounties are responding, however tentatively. And it’s starting here in Nova Scotia.
Last week in Digby, assistant commissioner Ian Atkins, the force’s commanding officer for Nova Scotia, apologized publicly for the actions of his fellow Mounties. He apologized to the people of Digby for years of systemic racism and brutality against African Nova Scotians and others by members of the Digby detachment.
Atkins was saying sorry for the behaviour of a rogue officer and some like-minded thugs in red serge, who harassed female co-workers and insulted and assaulted members of minority groups.
Admitting that a thorough investigation had verified a multitude of complaints, Atkins tried to make amends.
“I’m disappointed and I’m embarrassed,” he said in the story reported by The Chronicle Herald’s Brian Medel.
“I don’t condone, I cannot condone, activities or words that would be found to be offensive to you, to the black community, and the residents of Digby and I know that words were used that were offensive.”
That’s putting it mildly, chief.
Two former employees, both women, told investigators that the detachment’s former commander, Staff Sgt. Wylie Grimm, made many insulting remarks about them, touched them and degraded them. Witnesses said he directed racist comments at a black constable.
Atkins didn’t mention the many other allegations of serious misconduct by members of the Digby detachment. A convenience store’s video cameras captured two Mounties sucker-punching then pummeling a black customer for no reason other than his attitude.
In 2005, a mentally disturbed man, Paul Saulnier, was tackled by several Mounties and died after multiple shots from a Taser stun gun.
Locals in Digby say black drivers are pulled over far more often than whites, committing the crime of “driving while black.”
So Atkins’ apology is timely. His courage in doing so is to be applauded, because you can bet it happened over protests from Mounties who still advocate the “never apologize, never explain” policy.
Yet the apology, while significant, is not enough. Staff Sgt. Grimm was allowed to retire and didn’t face a code of conduct hearing, the RCMP equivalent of a court martial. We can only assume he retired with his full benefits. And officers who were quietly transferred didn’t face any real repercussions for their behaviour during the dark years that Grimm ran the detachment.
But let’s try to be positive and look forward. A day after Atkins’ statement, the RCMP launched a new diversity program, one that is long overdue.
It’s being launched in Digby and eventually will spread across Canada. RCMP officers will learn to understand the cultures and identities of Canadians of all races and ethnic backgrounds. The program is managed by Cpl. Craig Smith, whose book about bias in the Mounties, You Had Better be White by 6 a.m., was based on his own experiences and those of other black Mounties. He knows whereof he speaks.
In a country where ethnic diversity is a fact of life, it’s high time the Mounties rooted out bad officers and trained the good ones to be better. The credibility of the RCMP depends on it.
Just as important, the Mounties won’t be able to defend the country against terrorism or external threats if they can’t understand the people behind them. For pretty much everyone in Canada, the 21st century has arrived. It’s time for the Mounties to get there too.












2 responses so far ↓
1 Justbecause // Feb 5, 2008 at 23:25
Until Commissioner Elliot shakes the top of the tree ,I believe change will be almost non existent in the organization . The organization has lost much of the team approach and now its about what can you do for me . Bigger empires are being created without much thought going into the front line members that serve with so much pride . The organization is now become even more covert and secretive as it can not afford any more Public embarassment ….
2 speaking_my_mind // Feb 7, 2008 at 18:36
I agree totally about the team approach lacking. As I have harped about before this starts in Regina. The reason the ORG doesn’t teach teamwork in Depot anymore, is to divide and conquer. That is why they have gutless anonymous peer assessments.
A funny story going back a few years was when a male and female cadet got drunk at the Depot mess hall “the Last Stand” and ended up shagging in the basement lounge of B block. A fellow cadet saw them with their pants down around their ankles and didn’t report this, but was stupid enough to tell people about it. By the end of the weekend it was all over the base. A few weeks later someone spilled the beans via an anonymous letter placed under the door of their facilitator.
Once this got out of the bag, the place was turned upside down. Not only did the love birds get kicked out, but so did those who did not report it. Here is the best part. The CO and Dr. Bell interrogated each troop and Dr. Bell could not believe that someone that was going to be a Mountie would put an “anonymous” report under the door. The hilarious part is Dr. Bell is the one who brought in all this survivor type of gutless anonyomous assessments to begin with.
That is the problem with the upper management in the force, they play both sides of the arguement.
You must log in to post a comment.