RCMP Watch

Who is keeping them accountable?

Police say they won’t return witness’s video of airport Taser incident

October 30th, 2007 · 3 Comments

(CBC News) - A Victoria man who recorded video of a Polish man being jolted with a Taser and dying at Vancouver International Airport has gone to court to get the recording back from police so he can release it to the public.

But Cpl. Dale Carr of the Integrated Homicide Investigation team told CBC News that releasing the video would compromise the case.

“It’s clear that he wants to release that to the media and therefore any potential witnesses would view it, and then it would be compromised, and those witness accounts would just be tossed aside,” Carr said.

Police don’t plan to release the video until they decide it won’t compromise the investigation, Carr said.

Paul Pritchard said he used his digital camera to make an excellent quality recording of the incident early on Oct. 14, which attracted countrywide attention and increased debate over the use of the controversial stun guns.

Pritchard told CBC News that he captured Robert Dziekanski’s actions in the minutes before police arrived, the moment Dziekanski was jolted with a police Taser and the moment witnesses realized they had just seen a man die.

“There was no attempt to calm him down. The first step they took was to Taser him.”

Pritchard said he handed his digital camera and the recording over to police with the understanding they would be returned within 48 hours.

“They called me the next day and basically told me, ‘We are going to give you the camera, but sorry, we are not going to give you the footage, and it’s kind of disappeared,’” Pritchard said.

The camera was returned with a new memory stick.

After seeing media interviews with Dziekanski’s distraught mother, Zofia Cisowski, Pritchard decided to get the original video recording of the Taser incident returned, so he can make it public.

“I’m watching interviews with the woman and she is crying, and I see all this speculation that this happened and this happened, and I know what happened and I have got it all on videotape and it’s right there,” Pritchard told CBC News on Tuesday morning.

Pritchard said he does not know how many times police hit Dziekanski with a Taser jolt, because everything happened so quickly.

“I was looking through the camera the whole time, so, I mean, that part of it is not that clear to me,” he said.

But what he does remember, he said, is that police did not make any attempt to calm Dziekanski down before taking him down with the Taser.

“I sat there watching for at least 25 minutes before police and security arrived. We tried to calm him down.

“The police came. There was no attempt to calm him down. There was no attempt to restrain him. There was no attempt to bring in a translator.”

Lawyer says client has right to video

Pritchard’s lawyer, Paul Pearson, has filed documents in B.C. Supreme Court demanding that at least a copy of the video be given to his client.

“It’s not the subject, as I understand it, currently of a criminal investigation. It’s not a court exhibit. There is in fact very old law that says if you have somebody else’s property in your possession and they ask for it back, you have to give it back to them.”

Pritchard denied suggestions the lawsuit was motivated by a desire to sell the tape to the media.

“No, it has nothing to do with that. I’m just trying to get it out there,” he said.

“It wasn’t such a big thing at the beginning, but now that it’s being covered up, it’s making me wonder what’s on there that they are trying to cover up.”

Bookmark:
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Tags: Death While In Custody · Mounties Investigating Mounties

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Bill // Nov 1, 2007 at 13:47

    What are they worried about anyways?

    Give the man his tape and let him help the mother after all isn’t that the way police do their job gather evidence from inocent witnesses?

    enough :-(

  • 2 Brad // Nov 2, 2007 at 23:07

    I personally would not have handed it over without making a copy first. The guy is his own worst enemy. Quit whining because you were too stupid to not to make a copy. Of course the cops do not want it on the internet before the case is looked at fully. Duh… I would think it best to think before acting and then whining.

  • 3 Cup is 1/2 Full // Nov 3, 2007 at 13:40

    All the people need to do is keep filming but don’t tell them you did it then give what you filmed to the victims or their lawyers.

    Look at the former Commissioner; Only when they had to pay Aarar did it get their attention not before and with time it will be cleaned up and the police won’t even have to worry about it for one minute. Guess what tax payers will save tax money too…

You must log in to post a comment.