Skip to content

Lack of RCMP reforms at issue, observers say

Kenyon Wallace (National Post) – Frustration over a lack of promised reforms three years after a civilian was appointed to revive the troubled RCMP is at the heart of complaints about Comissioner William Elliott, say those familiar with the conflict.

As many as 10 deputy and assistant commissioners have complained to the Prime Minister’s Office about a perceived lack of progress in changes to the force’s governance structure, human resources and funding, as well as Mr. Elliott’s alleged “verbally abusive” and “abrasive” management style.

A career bureaucrat, Mr. Elliott became the first man without a background in policing to run the RCMP when he was appointed by Prime Minister Stephen Harper in 2007.

“The people complaining all want change … they’ve been down in the trenches with the force’s membership, so they know what it’s like,” said Ron Lewis, a recently retired senior Mountie, referring to problems associated with the force’s reported chronic understaffing and underfunding. “They find it very frustrating.”

Mr. Lewis, who helped expose the mismanagement of the RCMP’s pension plan in 2004 after a 35-year career, has spoken with some of the senior brass complaining about the lack of change within the organization.

He said a major concern of his former colleagues is the federal government’s delay in creating a civilian board of management, as recommended by independent investigator David Brown in his 2007 report “A Matter of Trust” on problems within the force. The board’s role would be to keep tabs on the commissioner, ensure transparency and handle all internal problems including staff complaints.

“That’s the most important reform the RCMP needed, so that when there’s a problem at the senior executive level, there’s somewhere to go,” Mr. Lewis said. “Having a board in place would have prevented things like [the recent publicity] from happening.”

Shortly after his appointment, Mr. Elliott established a “change management team” to spearhead a reorganization of the force’s upper echelons — an effort that, according to experts, has accomplished little.

“Part of the problem was that the Commissioner was brought in with a change mandate, but I’m not sure he really knows how to introduce, manage and sustain that change,” said Robert Gordon, director of Simon Fraser University’s School of Criminology.

“He’s up against a monolith and I don’t think one individual would be in a position to do very much.”

But Senator Colin Kenny, an expert on RCMP command structures, said that if Mr. Elliott believes he cannot accomplish his mandate, he should be speaking up on behalf of the force.

“Unless you address some of the major issues, like governance, you don’t get anywhere,” said Mr. Kenny. “The deputy and assistant commissioners have been pushing for it.”

He said the appointment of Mr. Elliott has served its purpose as a “cold shower” for the force and now someone with RCMP training should take over.

But that’s not likely to happen any time soon, said Mr. Lewis, who believes the governing Conservatives would not risk losing face by removing the very person they appointed to bring about change in the ranks.

“If they do pull him out now, the Opposition will be all over Mr. Harper, saying ‘You brought this guy in to control the RCMP. The RCMP fought back and they won. Who’s in control?,’” Mr. Lewis said.

He added, however, that such a crisis in leadership cannot continue indefinitely.

“If the team revolts against the coach, who goes? The coach.”

The government is refusing to comment until a workplace assessment overseen by the deputy minister of public safety is completed.

Categories: Abuse Of Mounties, Broken Force, Commissioner of the RCMP, Internal Morale, Senior Management.

Comment Feed

2 Responses

  1. The fact that Elliot is the roadblock to change is the real issue. He is after all the boss and nothing happens unless he okays it. If he has to he can always ask for a ministerial decree to back him up. There is no conspiracy to jump for his job. The senior personnel are trying to change things and he obfuscates.

    The very fact that the basis of the organization is command and control, he can issue directives that would immediately be followed. So what is the problem? He dithers because he does not know what to do, and cannot comprehend the effects the decisions will have on the organization because he is neither familiar with the law or any police procedures.

    It is not rocket science. He was put there to implement change. There are enough studies to indicate which direction the change should come from and what form that change should be in. Weigh the consequences and take some action.

    For example, under staffing. What is the big resistance to ensuring adequate manpower? Large organizations wrestle with this issue on a regular basis. If you cannot increase the numbers, consolidate from other areas. Begin with the most underused and least important areas and move the resources to the needed areas most burdened with the mandate of the organization.

    You may wish to understand the flow of government funds a bit better. There is no billions of cash sitting in some dusty account for the RCMP to use after being “dumped” there by the government.

    Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 13

    Deepthroat2010.08.1 @ 15:50
  2. They probably want Commissioner Elliot to get out now that the Harper Government dumped, under the financial radar without the knowledge or consent of the Canadian people, Billions of our tax payer’s dollars in the RCMP accounts.

    That’s what was really accomplished at the G-20.

    Kicking Elliot out and replacing him with another Zarccardelli command structure and with all that money sitting in the accounts, without making the changes to this military structure, is asking for trouble.

    First of all, if anyone should be under investigation it should be the leaders under him Commissioner Elliot because was he not appointed to lead and change this force?

    He would be an idiot to do something that would destroy his reputation and as of yet I have not heard or read anything that would indicate that Commissioner Elliot has broken any laws.

    Sounds to me like the 10 RCMP leaders are after his job and are using what they do best BULLYING their way forward to take control again and are acting like wolves attacking their pray.

    I say fire the 10 making the trouble and see if you can find 10 more in the 20,000 plus suitable to replace them and good luck.

    Well-liked comment. Do you Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 9

    Millions Waisted2010.07.31 @ 10:03