Comments on: Dziekanski inquiry: RCMP spokesman simply repeated what told to say http://www.rcmpwatch.com/dziekanski-inquiry-rcmp-spokesman-simply-repeated-what-told-to-say/ Who is keeping them accountable? Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:35:43 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Deepthroat http://www.rcmpwatch.com/dziekanski-inquiry-rcmp-spokesman-simply-repeated-what-told-to-say/comment-page-1/#comment-3269 Deepthroat Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:39:22 +0000 http://www.rcmpwatch.com/?p=1665#comment-3269 Knowing the video exists, and giving a statement with inconsistencies, is indication of relating the events as you saw them regardless of other external influences. To think that they would take something from a witness and destroy it to cover their ass is right out there with ufo abductions. You still have a witness don't you? Or perhaps maybe you think they would get rid of him too? Knowing the video exists, and giving a statement with inconsistencies, is indication of relating the events as you saw them regardless of other external influences. To think that they would take something from a witness and destroy it to cover their ass is right out there with ufo abductions. You still have a witness don’t you? Or perhaps maybe you think they would get rid of him too?

Do you Like or Dislike the above comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3

]]> By: Alcan http://www.rcmpwatch.com/dziekanski-inquiry-rcmp-spokesman-simply-repeated-what-told-to-say/comment-page-1/#comment-3265 Alcan Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:13:22 +0000 http://www.rcmpwatch.com/?p=1665#comment-3265 An Integrated Homicide Investigation Team, the officer in charge and twelve plain clothes officers at a debriefing sounds pretty much like they were concerned. Now who would watch a video of the incident and not conclude something is wrong and why would those four officers give statements like that knowing what the video had on it unless they were going to keep the video from the public and destroy it later. I wonder who all those people were and will they be called to testify?? An Integrated Homicide Investigation Team, the officer in charge and twelve plain clothes officers at a debriefing sounds pretty much like they were concerned.

Now who would watch a video of the incident and not conclude something is wrong and why would those four officers give statements like that knowing what the video had on it unless they were going to keep the video from the public and destroy it later.

I wonder who all those people were and will they be called to testify??

Do you Like or Dislike the above comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

]]>