Joe Schneider (Bloomberg) – A Canadian man can go ahead with a lawsuit claiming federal police used mind-reading techniques while investigating him, a British Columbia judge ruled.
David Ross, who lives near Hope, British Columbia, about 150 kilometers (90 miles) east of Vancouver, claims two police officers used what he called “neurophone, advanced neurophone and subliminal messaging” while he was under surveillance in 2003, according to court papers. He said that as a result, he suffers from headaches, sleeplessness and loss of normal brain function. A neurophone is an “electronic telepathy machine,” according to the Art of Hacking Web site.
Supreme Court Judge James Williams yesterday denied a request from the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General of British Columbia and the Attorney General of Canada to throw out the lawsuit. He said the defendants failed to prove the suit was doomed to fail, as is required by Canadian law.
“This suit is unusual and unconventional,” Williams wrote. “Reasonable people might consider the outcome of the present application an odd one. However, dealing with the issue on the basis of the arguments advanced, I am satisfied that these are the warranted results.”
A Royal Canadian Mounted Police officer said in court documents that he didn’t know what a neurophone is and knew of no technology by which members of the police force could read a person’s mind.
The judge wrote: “Mr. Ross relies upon certain excerpts of material from the Internet suggesting that such technology may be technically viable and may be used by some rogue agencies to interfere with the lives of others. The material is general in nature; it has no specific reference to Mr. Ross or any Canadian policing agency.”
The case is Ross v. British Columbia (Public Safety), S117620, Supreme Court of British Columbia (New Westminster).
It’s about time…. the courts stood for Justice.
It’s also allot worst than this case is…
Do you Like or Dislike the above comment:
1 
2
Deepthroat be careful you spoke about the technology, squads and aliens, they are likely to use subliminal messages to control you from now on and might use a laser to cause you to forget everything you said.
Do you Like or Dislike the above comment:
1 
0
I realize he has top secret clearance (as all RCMP do) but what level do you have to have to get access to the alien technology? I want that level, just to know what really is out there.
Perhaps I can just say to the government “Trust me I am a Scientist” then they will let me know.
Do you Like or Dislike the above comment:
1 
0
He may well be aware of the inventory of the detachment, however, he probably does not have clearance for the activities of the secret squads in the RCMP that are in league with aliens and their advanced technology.
The judge obviously knows about the dark cabal and is trying to expose it…
Do you Like or Dislike the above comment:
1 
0
I am assuming that the detachment commander would have access to an inventory of all items in the detachment. Would be familiar with the policies of the detachment and would be reading the files. SO he would in fact have knowledge as to if it would be used.
People need to realize the RCMP does not use mind control or other means of torture.
Seriously, open your eyes.
Do you Like or Dislike the above comment:
1 
1
” “I know of no technology or other means by which members of the RCMP could read a person’s mind or inflict subliminal messages on a person,” Staff Sgt. Dale Kjenhus, the commander of the Hope detachment, testified.
But B.C. Supreme Court Justice James Williams said the officer’s testimony and affidavit were not good enough.
In his ruling, released Friday, the judge said he intended no disrespect to Kjenhus, but found “his evidence that he is unaware of the technique is not by any means proof positive that it is not used.” ”
Well I guess they will just have to call Ghostbusters for an expert opinion. No disrespect to the officer? What about the public?
And some people ponder why the legal system is not fully respected. I wonder how much this will cost the taxpayers?
Full transcript: http://www.courts.go v.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/09/09/ 2009BCSC0930.htm
Do you Like or Dislike the above comment:
2 
0